Response to Comment on Pinsker et al. Randomized Crossover Comparison of Personalized MPC and PID Control Algorithms for the Artificial Pancreas. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1135–1142

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Response to Comment on Pinsker et al. Randomized Crossover Comparison of Personalized MPC and PID Control Algorithms for the Artificial Pancreas. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1135–1142

We thank Dr. Steil (1) for critically reviewing our study comparingmodel predictive control (MPC) and proportional integral derivative (PID) control for the artificial pancreas (2). We agree that MPC and PID both come in many variants and that there are many successful trials of PID control for automated insulin delivery. We acknowledged in our study that both controllers performed very well ov...

متن کامل

Randomized Crossover Comparison of Personalized MPC and PID Control Algorithms for the Artificial Pancreas

OBJECTIVE To evaluate two widely used control algorithms for an artificial pancreas (AP) under nonideal but comparable clinical conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After a pilot safety and feasibility study (n = 10), closed-loop control (CLC) was evaluated in a randomized, crossover trial of 20 additional adults with type 1 diabetes. Personalized model predictive control (MPC) and proport...

متن کامل

the evaluation and comparison of two esp textbooks available on the iranian market for teaching english to the students of medicine

abstract this study evaluated and compared medical terminology and english for the students of medicine (ii) as two representatives of the textbooks available on the iranian market for teaching english to the students of medicine. this research was performed on the basis of a teacher’s and a number of students’ attitudes and the students’ needs analysis for two reasons: first, to investigate...

15 صفحه اول

Comment on Ferrannini et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1108-1114. Comment on Mudaliar et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1115-1122.

In their recent articles, Ferrannini et al. (1) and Mudaliar et al. (2) suggest that increased ketonemia, improving heart function, might explain the positive results of the BI 10773 (Empagliflozin) Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (EMPA-REG OUTCOME) study. This suggestion perfectly fits with our recently published hypothesis that glucagon could be the key...

متن کامل

Response to Comment on Lee et al. Diabetes 2015;64:2836-2846. Comment on Roberts et al. Diabetes 2015;64:471-484.

We thank Kruszelnicka and Surdacki (1) for their insightful comments on our recent article (2), which suggested a favorable metabolic effect of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) that stimulates the polarization of hepatic resident macrophages toward an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Kruszelnicka and Surdacki ask whether the nitrate-nitrite pathway exerts beneficial metabolic effects in the liver. ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Diabetes Care

سال: 2016

ISSN: 0149-5992,1935-5548

DOI: 10.2337/dci16-0038